[openal] Further consideration of C++

[michael kapelko]

Well, that single header could be assembed by a machine. And I was
actually thinking of a C++ header.
On Mon, 29 Oct 2018 at 16:25, Chris Robinson <chris.kcat at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 10/29/18 4:05 AM, michael kapelko wrote:
> > Hi.
> > Is it possible to simply provide openal soft as single header file? No
> > headaches then.
>
> It's way too big for that. It'd be an unmaintainable mess and would no
> longer be a shared library that can be updated independently. That would
> also guarantee it couldn't switch to C++, otherwise C code wouldn't be
> able to include it.
> _______________________________________________
> openal mailing list
> openal at openal.org
> http://openal.org/mailman/listinfo/openal