[openal] HRTF functions raw or diffuse field equalized?

[Dejay]

Hello, quick question:

the def files for make_hrtf all contain references to the raw impulse
response files.
Shouldn't the "diffuse-field equalized HRTFs" be used instead? From what
(little) I understand they try to remove the influence of the recording
and speaker equipment from the HRTF. Isn't that a good thing?

Looking at them in a wave file editor, they all seem to be rather
shorter (almost clipped) and "less delayed".

http://sound.media.mit.edu/resources/KEMAR/KEMAR-FAQ.txt

Kind Regards,
Dennis Franken
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://openal.org/pipermail/openal/attachments/20140321/0fe50a85/attachment.html>